Nuclear factor-erythroid 2, nerve growth factor receptor, and CD34-microvessel density are differentially expressed in primary myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia.

TitleNuclear factor-erythroid 2, nerve growth factor receptor, and CD34-microvessel density are differentially expressed in primary myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsYigit N, Covey S, Barouk-Fox S, Turker T, Geyer JTurbiner, Orazi A
JournalHum Pathol
Volume46
Issue8
Pagination1217-25
Date Published2015 Aug
ISSN1532-8392
KeywordsAdolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antigens, CD34, Biomarkers, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Microvessels, Middle Aged, Nerve Tissue Proteins, NF-E2 Transcription Factor, p45 Subunit, Polycythemia Vera, Primary Myelofibrosis, Receptors, Nerve Growth Factor, Retrospective Studies, Thrombocythemia, Essential, Young Adult
Abstract

Because of the presence of various overlapping findings, the discrimination of polycythemia vera (PV) from prefibrotic/fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (PF/F-PMF) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) may be challenging, particularly in suboptimal bone marrow biopsy specimens. In this study, we assessed whether differences in the expression of nuclear factor-erythroid 2 (NF-E2), nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR; CD271), CD34, CD68, p53, CD3, CD20, and CD138 by immunohistochemistry could be useful in separating among them. Higher frequencies of nuclear positive erythroblasts with NF-E2 were observed in ET and PV cases (50% ± 13.3% and 41.5% ± 9.4%, respectively) when compared with both PF-PMF (21% ± 11.7%) and F-PMF (28.5% ± 10.8%). We found that with a cutoff level of at least 30% nuclear staining for NF-E2 in erythroblasts, we could reliably exclude the possibility of PMF. Conversely, NGFR+ stromal cells per high-power field (HPF) was significantly increased in F-PMF (53.5 ± 19.1/HPF) and PF-PMF (13.5 ± 3.8/HPF) compared with ET (4.4 ± 2.2/HPF) and PV (6.6 ± 3.3/HPF). Similarly, differences in CD34-microvessel density was remarkable in F-PMF and PF-PMF cases in comparison with PV and ET (49.9 ± 12.1/HPF, 29.3 ± 12.4/HPF, 13.7 ± 4.6/HPF, and 11.9 ± 5.1/HPF, respectively). Thus, the assessment of NF-E2 and NGFR expression and the evaluation of CD34-microvessel density may provide additional support in reaching a correct diagnosis in these cases of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

DOI10.1016/j.humpath.2015.05.004
Alternate JournalHum Pathol
PubMed ID26093937
Related Faculty: 
Julia Geyer, M.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700