Computer extracted gland features from H&E predicts prostate cancer recurrence comparably to a genomic companion diagnostic test: a large multi-site study.

TitleComputer extracted gland features from H&E predicts prostate cancer recurrence comparably to a genomic companion diagnostic test: a large multi-site study.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuthorsLeo P, Janowczyk A, Elliott R, Janaki N, Bera K, Shiradkar R, Farré X, Fu P, El-Fahmawi A, Shahait M, Kim J, Lee D, Yamoah K, Rebbeck TR, Khani F, Robinson BD, Eklund L, Jambor I, Merisaari H, Ettala O, Taimen P, Aronen HJ, Boström PJ, Tewari A, Magi-Galluzzi C, Klein E, Purysko A, Shih NNc, Feldman M, Gupta S, Lal P, Madabhushi A
JournalNPJ Precis Oncol
Volume5
Issue1
Pagination35
Date Published2021 May 03
ISSN2397-768X
Abstract

Existing tools for post-radical prostatectomy (RP) prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR) prognosis rely on human pathologist-derived parameters such as tumor grade, with the resulting inter-reviewer variability. Genomic companion diagnostic tests such as Decipher tend to be tissue destructive, expensive, and not routinely available in most centers. We present a tissue non-destructive method for automated BCR prognosis, termed "Histotyping", that employs computational image analysis of morphologic patterns of prostate tissue from a single, routinely acquired hematoxylin and eosin slide. Patients from two institutions (n = 214) were used to train Histotyping for identifying high-risk patients based on six features of glandular morphology extracted from RP specimens. Histotyping was validated for post-RP BCR prognosis on a separate set of n = 675 patients from five institutions and compared against Decipher on n = 167 patients. Histotyping was prognostic of BCR in the validation set (p < 0.001, univariable hazard ratio [HR] = 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.03-3.93, concordance index [c-index] = 0.68, median years-to-BCR: 1.7). Histotyping was also prognostic in clinically stratified subsets, such as patients with Gleason grade group 3 (HR = 4.09) and negative surgical margins (HR = 3.26). Histotyping was prognostic independent of grade group, margin status, pathological stage, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (multivariable p < 0.001, HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.40-3.10, n = 648). The combination of Histotyping, grade group, and preoperative PSA outperformed Decipher (c-index = 0.75 vs. 0.70, n = 167). These results suggest that a prognostic classifier for prostate cancer based on digital images could serve as an alternative or complement to molecular-based companion diagnostic tests.

DOI10.1038/s41698-021-00174-3
Alternate JournalNPJ Precis Oncol
PubMed ID33941830
PubMed Central IDPMC8093226
Related Faculty: 
Brian Robinson, M.D. Francesca Khani, M.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700