Comparison of microarray analysis of fine needle aspirates and tissue specimen in thyroid nodule diagnosis.

TitleComparison of microarray analysis of fine needle aspirates and tissue specimen in thyroid nodule diagnosis.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsKundel A, Zarnegar R, Kato M, Moo T-A, Zhu B, Scognamiglio T, Fahey TJ
JournalDiagn Mol Pathol
Volume19
Issue1
Pagination9-14
Date Published2010 Mar
ISSN1533-4066
KeywordsAdult, Aged, Biopsy, DNA, Complementary, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, RNA, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thyroid Gland, Thyroid Nodule, Young Adult
Abstract

Microarray technology provides a new opportunity to improve the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration (FNA) in evaluating thyroid nodules. Here, we evaluate whether ex vivo FNA and tissue samples can be used interchangeably in microarray and whether the method of acquisition affects the precision of the gene list that is generated. To assess whether FNA samples provide adequate material for reliable gene expression analysis, paired tissue and FNA samples were collected from 13 thyroid nodules; 7 malignant, 6 benign. RNA was extracted from each specimen, converted to complimentary DNA and hybridized to AffymetrixU-133 GeneChips. Cluster analysis was then performed using 61 genes predetermined to differentiate benign from malignant nodules. Clustering patterns were evaluated using 2-group K-means and hierarchical analysis. Twelve concordant pairs were used to generate differentially expressed genes between the sampling methods. Twenty-five of 26 samples clustered concordantly with the pathologic diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100%, 100%, and 100% for FNA and 85.7%, 100%, and 92.3% for tissue, respectively. Two-group K-means revealed an adjacent grouping for 12 of 13 pairs. Hierarchical analysis clustered 8 of 13 pairs together. Sixty-seven genes were differentially expressed between FNA and the tissue sampling methods. These genes predominantly represented stromal components and were upregulated in the tissue compared with FNA samples. We conclude that FNA is a reliable alternative to tissue samples in predicting malignancy with microarray.

DOI10.1097/PDM.0b013e3181ae870c
Alternate JournalDiagn Mol Pathol
PubMed ID20186006
Related Faculty: 
Theresa Scognamiglio, M.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700