Association of HLA Typing and Alloimmunity With Posttransplantation Membranous Nephropathy: A Multicenter Case Series.

TitleAssociation of HLA Typing and Alloimmunity With Posttransplantation Membranous Nephropathy: A Multicenter Case Series.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsBatal I, Vasilescu E-R, Dadhania DM, Adel AAbderrahma, S Husain A, Avasare R, Serban G, Santoriello D, Khairallah P, Patel A, Moritz MJ, Latulippe E, Riopel J, Khallout K, Swanson SJ, Bomback AS, Mohan S, Ratner L, Radhakrishnan J, Cohen DJ, Appel GB, Stokes MB, Markowitz GS, Seshan SV, De Serres SA, Andeen N, Loupy A, Kiryluk K, D'Agati VD
JournalAm J Kidney Dis
Volume76
Issue3
Pagination374-383
Date Published2020 09
ISSN1523-6838
KeywordsAdult, Aged, Allografts, Europe, Female, Glomerulonephritis, Membranous, Histocompatibility Testing, HLA Antigens, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Isoantibodies, Isoantigens, Kidney Transplantation, Male, Middle Aged, North America, Postoperative Complications, Receptors, Phospholipase A2, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies
Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES: Posttransplantation membranous nephropathy (MN) represents a rare complication of kidney transplantation that can be classified as recurrent or de novo. The clinical, pathologic, and immunogenetic characteristics of posttransplantation MN and the differences between de novo and recurrent MN are not well understood.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter case series.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: We included 77 patients from 5 North American and European medical centers with post-kidney transplantation MN (27 de novo and 50 recurrent). Patients with MN in the native kidney who received kidney allografts but did not develop recurrent MN were used as nonrecurrent controls (n = 43). To improve understanding of posttransplantation MN, we compared de novo MN with recurrent MN and then contrasted recurrent MN with nonrecurrent controls.

FINDINGS: Compared with recurrent MN, de novo MN was less likely to be classified as primary MN (OR, 0.04; P < 0.001) and had more concurrent antibody-mediated rejection (OR, 12.0; P < 0.001) and inferior allograft survival (HR for allograft failure, 3.2; P = 0.007). HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DR17 antigens were more common in recipients with recurrent MN compared with those with de novo MN; however, the frequency of these recipient antigens in recurrent MN was similar to that in nonrecurrent MN controls. Among the 93 kidney transplant recipients with native kidney failure attributed to MN, older recipient age (HR per each year older, 1.03; P = 0.02), recipient HLA-A3 antigen (HR, 2.5; P = 0.003), steroid-free immunosuppressive regimens (HR, 2.84; P < 0.001), and living related allograft (HR, 1.94; P = 0.03) were predictors of MN recurrence.

LIMITATIONS: Retrospective case series, limited sample size due to rarity of the disease, nonstandardized nature of data collection and biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS: De novo and recurrent MN likely represent separate diseases. De novo MN is associated with humoral alloimmunity and guarded outcome. Potential predisposing factors for recurrent MN include recipients who are older, recipient HLA-A3 antigen, steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen, and living related donor kidney.

DOI10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.01.009
Alternate JournalAm J Kidney Dis
PubMed ID32359820
PubMed Central IDPMC7483441
Grant ListR01 DK105124 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
R01 DK114893 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
RC2 DK116690 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
U01 DK116066 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
Related Faculty: 
Surya V. Seshan, M.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700