Neuroendocrine differentiation in usual-type prostatic adenocarcinoma: Molecular characterization and clinical significance.

TitleNeuroendocrine differentiation in usual-type prostatic adenocarcinoma: Molecular characterization and clinical significance.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsKaur H, Samarska I, Lu J, Faisal F, Maughan BL, Murali S, Asrani K, Alshalalfa M, Antonarakis ES, Epstein JI, Joshu CE, Schaeffer EM, Mosquera JMiguel, Lotan TL
JournalProstate
Volume80
Issue12
Pagination1012-1023
Date Published2020 09
ISSN1097-0045
KeywordsAdenocarcinoma, Carcinoma, Small Cell, Cell Differentiation, Cohort Studies, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Neuroendocrine Cells, Neuroendocrine Tumors, Prostatic Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant, PTEN Phosphohydrolase, Receptors, Androgen, Retinoblastoma Binding Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Signal Transduction, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small cell neuroendocrine (NE) carcinomas of the prostate classically lose androgen receptor (AR) expression, may harbor loss of the RB1, TP53, and PTEN tumor suppressor genes, and are associated with a poor prognosis. However usual-type adenocarcinomas may also contain areas of NE differentiation, and in this context the molecular features and biological significance are less certain.

METHODS: We examined the molecular phenotype and oncologic outcomes of primary prostate adenocarcinomas with ≥5% NE differentiation (≥5% chromogranin A-positive NE cells in any given tumor spot on tissue microarray) using three independent study sets: a set of tumors with paneth cell-like NE differentiation (n = 26), a retrospective case-cohort of intermediate- and high-risk patients enriched for adverse outcomes (n = 267), and primary tumors from a retrospective series of men with eventual castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide (n = 55).

RESULTS: Benign NE cells expressed significantly lower quantified AR levels compared with paired benign luminal cells (P < .001). Similarly, paneth-like NE carcinoma cells or carcinoma cells expressing chromogranin A expressed significantly lower quantified AR levels than paired non-NE carcinoma cells (P < .001). Quantified ERG protein expression, was also lower in chromogranin A-labeled adenocarcinoma cells compared with unlabeled cells (P < .001) and tumors with NE differentiation showed lower gene expression scores for AR activity compared with those without. Despite evidence of lower AR signaling, adenocarcinomas with NE differentiation did not differ by prevalence of TP53 missense mutations, or PTEN or RB1 loss, compared with those without NE differentiation. Finally, NE differentiation was not associated with time to metastasis in intermediate- and high-risk patients (P = .6 on multivariate analysis), nor with progression-free survival in patients with CRPC treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide (P = .9).

CONCLUSION: NE differentiation in usual-type primary prostate adenocarcinoma is a molecularly and clinically distinct form of lineage plasticity from that occurring in small cell NE carcinoma.

DOI10.1002/pros.24035
Alternate JournalProstate
PubMed ID32649013
Grant List5P30CA006973-52 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
P50CA58236 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
Related Faculty: 
Juan Miguel Mosquera, M.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700