The morphologic and molecular genetic categories of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders are clinically relevant.

TitleThe morphologic and molecular genetic categories of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders are clinically relevant.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication1998
AuthorsChadburn A, Chen JM, Hsu DT, Frizzera G, Cesarman E, Garrett TJ, Mears JG, Zangwill SD, Addonizio LJ, Michler RE, Knowles DM
Date Published1998 May 15
KeywordsAdult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Heart Transplantation, Herpesvirus 4, Human, Humans, Hyperplasia, Kidney Transplantation, Lung Transplantation, Lymphoma, B-Cell, Lymphoproliferative Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Polymorphism, Genetic, Serologic Tests, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PT-LPDs) are a well-known complication of immunosuppression associated with solid organ transplantation. The clinical course of PT-LPDs is unpredictable; some patients experience regression of all lesions with a reduction in immunosuppression, whereas other patients, despite chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgery, rapidly die of their disease. In this study, the authors attempted to establish whether the previously described morphologic and molecular genetic categories of PT-LPD--plasmacytic hyperplasia (PH), polymorphic PT-LPD (polymorphic), and malignant lymphoma/multiple myeloma (ML/MM)--are clinically relevant and helpful in predicting the clinical outcome of patients who develop these lesions.

METHODS: To determine the clinical significance of the morphologic and molecular genetic categories of PT-LPDs, the clinical characteristics of 32 solid organ transplant recipients (26 heart, 5 kidney, and 1 lung), including age, time from transplantation to development of PT-LPD, stage of disease, and clinical outcome, were compared with the morphologic and molecular genetic features of the 41 PT-LPDs that they developed (15 PH in 12 patients, 19 polymorphic in 16 patients, and 7 ML/MM in 6 patients). Clinical outcome was defined by the following categories: 1) regression (after a reduction in immunosuppression) and surgical resolution (by surgical excision, with or without a reduction in immunosuppression); 2) medical resolution (by chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy); and 3) no response.

RESULTS: Although there was no difference in the time from transplantation to PT-LPD development among patients belonging to the three morphologic and molecular genetic categories, there was a significant difference in patient age at the time of PT-LPD development (P < 0.0098). Younger patients developed PH (mean age of 19 years), whereas older patients developed polymorphic PT-LPD (mean age of 35 years) and ML/MM (mean age of 56 years). Patients with PH presented with lower stages of disease (Stages I-II) than patients with ML/MM (P < 0.0004). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant trend between morphologic and molecular genetic category and clinical outcome, with decreased likelihood that lesions categorized as PH, polymorphic, or ML/MM would regress with a reduction in immunosuppression or be resolved by surgery, whereas those classified as ML/MM were more likely to exhibit no response to aggressive clinical intervention (P < 0.00006). Furthermore, no patients with PH died, whereas 20% with polymorphic PT-LPD and 67% with ML/MM died as a direct result of their PT-LPDs.

CONCLUSIONS: This study strongly suggests that classification of PT-LPDs into the morphologic and molecular genetic categories PH, polymorphic, PT-LPD and ML/MM is clinically relevant.

Alternate JournalCancer
PubMed ID9587133
Related Faculty: 
Amy Chadburn, M.D. Ethel Cesarman, M.D., Ph.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700