Evaluation of markers for CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer by a large population-based sample.

TitleEvaluation of markers for CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer by a large population-based sample.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2007
AuthorsOgino S, Kawasaki T, Kirkner GJ, Kraft P, Loda M, Fuchs CS
JournalJ Mol Diagn
Volume9
Issue3
Pagination305-14
Date Published2007 Jul
ISSN1525-1578
KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Biomarkers, Tumor, Calcium Channels, T-Type, Carcinoma, Cohort Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms, Core Binding Factor Alpha 3 Subunit, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genetic Testing, Genetics, Population, Humans, Insulin-Like Growth Factor II, Male, MutL Protein Homolog 1, Nuclear Proteins, Phenotype, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Proteins, Sensitivity and Specificity
Abstract

The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP or CIMP-high) with extensive promoter methylation is a distinct phenotype in colorectal cancer. However, a choice of markers for CIMP has been controversial. A recent extensive investigation has selected five methylation markers (CACNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3, and SOCS1) as surrogate markers for epigenomic aberrations in tumor. The use of these markers as a CIMP-specific panel needs to be validated by an independent, large dataset. Using MethyLight assays on 920 colorectal cancers from two large prospective cohort studies, we quantified DNA methylation in eight CIMP-specific markers [the above five plus CDKN2A (p16), CRABP1, and MLH1]. A CIMP-high cutoff was set at > or = 6/8 or > or = 5/8 methylated promoters, based on tumor distribution and BRAF/KRAS mutation frequencies. All but two very specific markers [MLH1 (98% specific) and SOCS1 (93% specific)] demonstrated > or = 85% sensitivity and > or = 80% specificity, indicating overall good concordance in methylation patterns and good performance of these markers. Based on sensitivity, specificity, and false positives and negatives, the eight markers were ranked in order as: RUNX3, CACNA1G, IGF2, MLH1, NEUROG1, CRABP1, SOCS1, and CDKN2A. In conclusion, a panel of markers including at least RUNX3, CACNA1G, IGF2, and MLH1 can serve as a sensitive and specific marker panel for CIMP-high.

DOI10.2353/jmoldx.2007.060170
Alternate JournalJ Mol Diagn
PubMed ID17591929
PubMed Central IDPMC1899428
Grant ListP01 CA055075 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
P01 CA087969 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
P01 CA55075 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
P01 CA87969 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
Related Faculty: 
Massimo Loda, M.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700