Current Laboratory Testing Practices for Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 in Endometrial Serous Carcinoma and Colorectal Carcinoma.

TitleCurrent Laboratory Testing Practices for Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 in Endometrial Serous Carcinoma and Colorectal Carcinoma.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2023
AuthorsHagemann IS, Bridge JA, Tafe LJ, Hameed MR, Moncur JT, Bellizzi AM, Dolan M, Vasalos P, Kane ME, Souers RJ, Yemelyanova A
JournalArch Pathol Lab Med
Volume147
Issue10
Pagination1148-1157
Date Published2023 Oct 01
ISSN1543-2165
KeywordsBiomarkers, Tumor, Breast Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Endometrial Neoplasms, Esophageal Neoplasms, Female, Humans, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Receptor, ErbB-2, Stomach Neoplasms, United States
Abstract

CONTEXT.—: Therapy targeted at human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; also known as ERBB2) was used initially for breast and gastroesophageal carcinoma and has more recently been adopted for endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC) and colorectal carcinoma (CRC). There is evidence that predictive biomarker testing algorithms for HER2 must be tumor type specific and that an algorithm validated for one tumor type cannot be applied to another.

OBJECTIVE.—: To describe current laboratory practices for HER2 assessment in ESC and CRC.

DESIGN.—: We surveyed laboratories participating in the 2021 College of American Pathologists (CAP) HER2 immunohistochemistry proficiency testing program.

RESULTS.—: The survey was distributed to 1548 laboratories and returned by 1195, of which 83.5% (998) were in the United States. For ESC, 24.0% (287) of laboratories reported performing in-house testing for HER2 by immunohistochemical staining and/or in situ hybridization; of these, 44.3% (127) performed it reflexively on all cases of ESC. The most common criterion for evaluating HER2 was the American Society of Clinical Oncology/CAP 2018 guideline for breast carcinoma (69.0%; 194 of 281), whereas only 16.0% (45) of laboratories used guidelines specific to ESC. For CRC, 20.2% (239 of 1185) of laboratories performed in-house HER2 testing, and 82.0% of these (196) did the test only at the clinician's request. A plurality (49.4%; 115 of 233) used gastroesophageal cancer guidelines when scoring CRC, 30.0% (70) used the CRC scoring system from the HERACLES trial, and 16.3% (38) used the American Society of Clinical Oncology/CAP 2018 guideline for breast carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS.—: Laboratories vary in their approach to HER2 testing in ESC and CRC. Most laboratories did not report using tumor type-specific recommendations for HER2 interpretation. The lack of standardization could present a challenge to evidence-based practice when considering targeted therapy for these diseases.

DOI10.5858/arpa.2022-0229-CP
Alternate JournalArch Pathol Lab Med
PubMed ID36538387
PubMed Central IDPMC11062402
Grant ListP30 CA008748 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
P50 CA265793 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
Related Faculty: 
Anna Yemelyanova, M.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700