Application of the Milan System for Reporting Submandibular Gland Cytopathology: An international, multi-institutional study.

TitleApplication of the Milan System for Reporting Submandibular Gland Cytopathology: An international, multi-institutional study.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsMaleki Z, Baloch Z, Lu R, Shafique K, Song SJ, Viswanathan K, Rao RA, Lefler H, Fatima A, Wiles A, Jo VY, Wang H, Fadda G, Powers CN, Ali SZ, Pantanowitz L, Siddiqui MT, Nayar R, Klijanienko J, Barkan GA, Krane JF, Rossi ED, Callegari F, Kholová I, Bongiovanni M, Faquin WC, Pusztaszeri MP
JournalCancer Cytopathol
Volume127
Issue5
Pagination306-315
Date Published2019 05
ISSN1934-6638
KeywordsAdolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Child, Child, Preschool, Cytodiagnosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Facilities, Humans, Infant, International Agencies, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Precancerous Conditions, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Salivary Gland Neoplasms, Submandibular Gland, Young Adult
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a 6-tier diagnostic category system with associated risks of malignancy (ROMs) and management recommendations. Submandibular gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is uncommon with a higher frequency of inflammatory lesions and a higher relative proportion of malignancy, and this may affect the ROM and subsequent management. This study evaluated the application of the MSRSGC and the ROM for each diagnostic category for 734 submandibular gland FNAs.

METHODS: Submandibular gland FNA cytology specimens from 15 international institutions (2013-2017) were retrospectively assigned to an MSRSGC diagnostic category as follows: nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), benign neoplasm, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP), suspicious for malignancy (SM), or malignant. A correlation with the available histopathologic follow-up was performed, and the ROM was calculated for each MSRSGC diagnostic category.

RESULTS: The case cohort of 734 aspirates was reclassified according to the MSRSGC as follows: nondiagnostic, 21.4% (0%-50%); nonneoplastic, 24.2% (9.1%-53.6%); AUS, 6.7% (0%-14.3%); benign neoplasm, 18.3% (0%-52.5%); SUMP, 12% (0%-37.7%); SM, 3.5% (0%-12.5%); and malignant, 13.9% (2%-31.3%). The histopathologic follow-up was available for 333 cases (45.4%). The ROMs were as follows: nondiagnostic, 10.6%; nonneoplastic, 7.5%; AUS, 27.6%; benign neoplasm, 3.2%; SUMP, 41.9%; SM, 82.3%; and malignant, 93.6%.

CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional study shows that the ROM of each MSRSGC category for submandibular gland FNA is similar to that reported for parotid gland FNA, although the reported rates for the different MSRSGC categories were variable across institutions. Thus, the MSRSGC can be reliably applied to submandibular gland FNA.

DOI10.1002/cncy.22135
Alternate JournalCancer Cytopathol
PubMed ID31050186
PubMed Central IDPMC7404554
Grant ListP01 CA240239 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
Related Faculty: 
Momin Siddiqui, M.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700