Impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

TitleImpact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2022
AuthorsNuzzo PVitale, Adib E, Weise N, Curran C, Stewart T, Freeman D, Nassar AH, Alaiwi SAbou, Bakouny Z, McGregor BA, Choueiri TK, Jain RK, McKay RR, Sonpavde G
JournalClin Genitourin Cancer
Volume20
Issue4
Pagination301-306
Date Published2022 Aug
ISSN1938-0682
KeywordsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Humans, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Kidney Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Renin-Angiotensin System, Retrospective Studies, Tumor Microenvironment
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) have been shown to improve outcomes in studies of multiple malignancies by effects on the tumor microenvironment to enhance the immune repertoire and improve drug delivery. Repurposing RASi to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may improve survival coupled with tolerability and cost efficacy. We evaluated the impact of RASi on outcomes in mRCC patients receiving ICI.

METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included mRCC patients treated with ICI with or without RASi. The patients from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) were used as a discovery cohort, and the patients from University of California San Diego (UCSD) were used for validation. Receipt of an ICI (PD1/L1 and/or CTLA-4 inhibitors) was required. RASi use was defined as receipt of a RASi at baseline and for a minimum of 30 days after ICI initiation. For both the discovery and validation cohorts, the primary outcome assessed was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS: Overall, 229 patients who received an ICI were included: 100 patients from DFCI and 129 patients from UCSD. Concomitant RASi were administered in 30 patients (30%) in the DFCI cohort and 59 (45%) in the UCSD cohort. Median age at ICI initiation was 62.5 years in both cohorts. Median follow-up was 3.8 [IQR 3-5.3] years in the DFCI cohort, and 2.3 [IQR 1.4-3.6] years in the UCSD cohort. In the DFCI cohort, RASi was significantly associated with longer OS (adjusted-HR 0.35 [95% CI, 0.17-0.70], P = .003) and TTF (adjusted-HR 0.57 [0.36-0.92], P = .02). In the validation cohort, RASi was associated with TTF (adjusted HR, 0.60 [0.39-0.92], P = .02) and not statistically associated with OS (adjusted-HR 0.60 [0.34-1.06], P = .07). The propensity analysis, matching 83 patients from both cohorts receiving RASi while on ICI with 83 who did not, showed that RASi significantly improved OS (HR 0.59 [0.37-0.95], P = .03) and TTF (HR 0.60 [0.43-0.85], P = .0034).

CONCLUSIONS: RASi was associated with improved OS and TTF in mRCC patients receiving ICI. This provides a rationale for prospective randomized studies combining ICI and RASi in mRCC patients.

DOI10.1016/j.clgc.2022.04.012
Alternate JournalClin Genitourin Cancer
PubMed ID35614012
PubMed Central IDPMC10013974
Grant ListR01 NS118929 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
U01 CA224348 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
R01 CA259253 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
R35 CA197743 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
R01 CA269672 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
R01 CA208205 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
Related Faculty: 
Pier Nuzzo, Ph.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700