Population-based study of the incidence and survival for intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.

TitlePopulation-based study of the incidence and survival for intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsDinerman BF, Khani F, Golan R, Bernstein AN, Cosiano MF, Margolis DJ, Hu JC
JournalUrol Oncol
Volume35
Issue12
Pagination673.e9-673.e14
Date Published2017 12
ISSN1873-2496
KeywordsAged, Carcinoma, Ductal, Humans, Incidence, Lymphatic Metastasis, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, SEER Program, Survival Analysis, United States
Abstract

PURPOSE: The degree to which intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) affects clinical course remains poorly understood owing to small sample sizes from single-center studies. We sought to determine prognostic factors and outcomes associated with IDC-P in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of RP during 2004 to 2013 using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results to compare IDC-P with non-IDC-P. The effect of IDC-P on overall and disease-specific survival was assessed using Cox regression with a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.6-7.0y; P = 0.01). Median prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis in IDC-P vs. non-IDC-P was similar (P = 0.23) at 6.2 (IQR: 4.6-13.0) vs. 6.1ng/ml (IQR: 4.6-9.8).

RESULTS: We identified 159,777 RP from 2004 to 2013, and 242 (0.002%) had IDC-P pathologic features. IDC-P was associated with a greater likelihood of extraprostatic stage, pT3/T4, 45.9% vs. 21.6% (P<0.001), higher grade, GS≥ 7, 79.3% vs. 62.7% (P<0.001), lymph node metastases, 5.8% vs. 2.4% (P<0.001), and positive surgical margins, 25.6% vs. 19.5% (P = 0.02). IDC-P was associated with a 3-fold increase in prostate cancer-specific mortality relative to non-IDC-P (hazard ratio = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.5-5.7; P<0.01). Limitations include retrospective design and potential underreporting of IDC-P that leads to underestimation of the true effect size.

CONCLUSIONS: The significance of IDC-P features has been recently recognized by the World Health Organization and it is associated with high-grade, extraprostatic features, and worse prostate cancer-specific mortality. Understanding its prognostic significance better guides adjuvant therapies and clinical trials.

DOI10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.015
Alternate JournalUrol Oncol
PubMed ID28919182
Related Faculty: 
Francesca Khani, M.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700