Pathology & Laboratory Medicine

Publications

Filter By Faculty

Filter by Principal Investigator

2018

Vaisitti T, Braggio E, Allan JN, Arruga F, Serra S, Zamò A, et al. Novel Richter Syndrome Xenograft Models to Study Genetic Architecture, Biology, and Therapy Responses. Cancer Res. 2018;78(13):3413-3420.

Patel N, Cricco-Lizza E, Kasabwala K, Xu C, Robinson BD, Khani F, et al. The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(4):263-267.

Ahearn TU, Peisch S, Pettersson A, Ebot EM, Zhou CK, Graff RE, et al. Expression of IGF/insulin receptor in prostate cancer tissue and progression to lethal disease. Carcinogenesis. 2018;39(12):1431-1437.

Reich-Slotky R, Makhani SS, Vasovic LV, Pearse RN, Rossi A, Philips A, et al. Comparison of time to engraftment between autologous patients receiving washed versus non-washed cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cell products. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59(12):2829-2835.

Yin Y, Garcia MR, Novak AJ, Saunders AM, Ank RS, Nam AS, et al. Surf4 (Erv29p) binds amino-terminal tripeptide motifs of soluble cargo proteins with different affinities, enabling prioritization of their exit from the endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(8):e2005140.

Huang J, Diaz-Meco MT, Moscat J. The macroenviromental control of cancer metabolism by p62. Cell Cycle. 2018;17(17):2110-2121.

Ellis L, Loda M. LSD1: A single target to combat lineage plasticity in lethal prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(18):4530-4531.

Avecilla ST, Goss C, Marionneaux SM, Wright DR, Leiva TD, Tonon J-, et al. Method comparison study of peripheral blood CD34+ count performed on an Abbott CELL-DYN Sapphire hematology analyzer versus flow cytometry reference procedure (modified ISHAGE). Adv Cell Gene Ther. 2018;1(2).

Correction: Whole-Genome Sequencing of Salivary Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2018;11(4):249.

Sweeney J, Rao R, Margolskee E, Goyal A, Heymann JJ, Siddiqui MT. Immunohistochemical staining for S100P, SMAD4, and IMP3 on cell block preparations is sensitive and highly specific for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2018;7(6):318-323.