Pathology & Laboratory Medicine

Publications

Filter By Faculty

Filter by Principal Investigator

2019

Westblade LF, Nussbaum AJ, McAdam AJ. Can You Speciate This for Me? A Micro-Comic Strip. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(7).

Kodiyanplakkal RP, Laplante JM, Westblade LF, Van Besien K, Salvatore M, St George K. Detection and Characterization of Influenza B Virus With Reduced Neuraminidase Susceptibility in a Stem Cell Transplant Recipient. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(12):ofz493.

Alvarez MJ, Yan P, Alpaugh ML, Bowden M, Sicinska E, Zhou CW, et al. Reply to 'H-STS, L-STS and KRJ-I are not authentic GEPNET cell lines'. Nat Genet. 2019;51(10):1427-1428.

Liu B, Li L, Yang G, Geng C, Luo Y, Wu W, et al. PARP Inhibition Suppresses GR-MYCN-CDK5-RB1-E2F1 Signaling and Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(22):6839-6851.

Tierney JF, Vogle A, Poirier J, Min IM, Finnerty B, Zarnegar R, et al. Expression of programmed death ligand 1 and 2 in adrenocortical cancer tissues: An exploratory study. Surgery. 2019;165(1):196-201.

Magro CM, Olson LC, Momtahen S. Post-thymic CD4 positive cytotoxic T cell infiltrates of the skin: A clinical and histomorphologic spectrum of the unique CD4 positive T cell of immunosenescence. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2019;38:99-105.

Schwartz Z, Magro C, Nuovo G. The molecular-based differentiation of Heck's disease from its mimics including oral condyloma and white sponge nevus. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2019;43:151402.

Bartlett NL, Wilson WH, Jung S-, Hsi ED, Maurer MJ, Pederson LD, et al. Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-R Compared With R-CHOP as Frontline Therapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Clinical Outcomes of the Phase III Intergroup Trial Alliance/CALGB 50303. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(21):1790-1799.

Hamid AA, Gray KP, Shaw G, Macconaill LE, Evan C, Bernard B, et al. Compound Genomic Alterations of TP53, PTEN, and RB1 Tumor Suppressors in Localized and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;76(1):89-97.

McIntire PJ, Snow JT, Elsoukkary SS, Soong L, Sweeney J, Robinson BD, et al. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value below 0.7 for positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol. 2019;127(2):120-124.