Pathology & Laboratory Medicine

Publications

Filter By Faculty

Filter by Principal Investigator

2019

Chang R, Tosi U, Voronina J, Adeuyan O, Wu LY, Schweitzer ME, et al. Combined targeting of PI3K and MEK effector pathways via CED for DIPG therapy. Neurooncol Adv. 2019;1(1):vdz004.

Garcia-Bermudez J, Baudrier L, Bayraktar EC, Shen Y, La K, Guarecuco R, et al. Squalene accumulation in cholesterol auxotrophic lymphomas prevents oxidative cell death. Nature. 2019;567(7746):118-122.

Kondo M, Dalai SC, Venkatasubrahmanyam S, Eisenberg N, Robinson BD, Westblade LF, et al. Diagnosis and Genotyping of Endocarditis in a Patient with Prosthetic Pulmonary Valve Replacement Using Next-Generation Sequencing of Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(6):ofz242.

Heavican TB, Bouska A, Yu J, Lone W, Amador C, Gong Q, et al. Genetic drivers of oncogenic pathways in molecular subgroups of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2019;133(15):1664-1676.

Lee Y-, Uchida H, Smith H, Ito A, Sanchez T. The isolation and molecular characterization of cerebral microvessels. Nat Protoc. 2019;14(11):3059-3081.

Zhang Y, Zhou CK, Rencsok EM, Fall K, Lotan TL, Loda M, et al. A Prospective Study of Intraprostatic Inflammation, Focal Atrophy, and Progression to Lethal Prostate Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28(12):2047-2054.

Magro CM, Olson LC, Momtahen S. Post-thymic CD4 positive cytotoxic T cell infiltrates of the skin: A clinical and histomorphologic spectrum of the unique CD4 positive T cell of immunosenescence. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2019;38:99-105.

Fernandez EM, Eng K, Beg S, Beltran H, Faltas BM, Mosquera JM, et al. Cancer-Specific Thresholds Adjust for Whole Exome Sequencing-based Tumor Mutational Burden Distribution. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3.

Schwartz Z, Magro C, Nuovo G. The molecular-based differentiation of Heck's disease from its mimics including oral condyloma and white sponge nevus. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2019;43:151402.

McIntire PJ, Snow JT, Elsoukkary SS, Soong L, Sweeney J, Robinson BD, et al. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value below 0.7 for positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol. 2019;127(2):120-124.