Pathology & Laboratory Medicine

Publications

Filter By Faculty

Filter by Principal Investigator

2019

Chang R, Tosi U, Voronina J, Adeuyan O, Wu LY, Schweitzer ME, et al. Combined targeting of PI3K and MEK effector pathways via CED for DIPG therapy. Neurooncol Adv. 2019;1(1):vdz004.

Garcia-Bermudez J, Baudrier L, Bayraktar EC, Shen Y, La K, Guarecuco R, et al. Squalene accumulation in cholesterol auxotrophic lymphomas prevents oxidative cell death. Nature. 2019;567(7746):118-122.

Zhao Z, Fan J, Hsu Y-, Lyon CJ, Ning B, Hu TY. Extracellular vesicles as cancer liquid biopsies: from discovery, validation, to clinical application. Lab Chip. 2019;19(7):1114-1140.

Heavican TB, Bouska A, Yu J, Lone W, Amador C, Gong Q, et al. Genetic drivers of oncogenic pathways in molecular subgroups of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2019;133(15):1664-1676.

Kondo M, Dalai SC, Venkatasubrahmanyam S, Eisenberg N, Robinson BD, Westblade LF, et al. Diagnosis and Genotyping of Endocarditis in a Patient with Prosthetic Pulmonary Valve Replacement Using Next-Generation Sequencing of Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(6):ofz242.

Magro CM, Olson LC, Momtahen S. Post-thymic CD4 positive cytotoxic T cell infiltrates of the skin: A clinical and histomorphologic spectrum of the unique CD4 positive T cell of immunosenescence. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2019;38:99-105.

Zhang Y, Zhou CK, Rencsok EM, Fall K, Lotan TL, Loda M, et al. A Prospective Study of Intraprostatic Inflammation, Focal Atrophy, and Progression to Lethal Prostate Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28(12):2047-2054.

Bartlett NL, Wilson WH, Jung S-, Hsi ED, Maurer MJ, Pederson LD, et al. Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-R Compared With R-CHOP as Frontline Therapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Clinical Outcomes of the Phase III Intergroup Trial Alliance/CALGB 50303. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(21):1790-1799.

Schwartz Z, Magro C, Nuovo G. The molecular-based differentiation of Heck's disease from its mimics including oral condyloma and white sponge nevus. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2019;43:151402.

McIntire PJ, Snow JT, Elsoukkary SS, Soong L, Sweeney J, Robinson BD, et al. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value below 0.7 for positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol. 2019;127(2):120-124.