No increase in the incidence of cardiac troponin I concentration above the 99th percentile by Siemens Centaur high-sensitivity compared to the contemporary assay.

TitleNo increase in the incidence of cardiac troponin I concentration above the 99th percentile by Siemens Centaur high-sensitivity compared to the contemporary assay.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuthorsYang HS, Shemesh A, Li J, Xie T, Apple FS, Williams JA, Zhao Z, Steel PAD
JournalClin Biochem
Volume89
Pagination77-80
Date Published2021 Mar
ISSN1873-2933
KeywordsAdolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biological Assay, Biomarkers, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Reference Values, Retrospective Studies, Troponin I, United States, Young Adult
Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the incidence of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) concentrations above the limit of quantification (LOQ) and the sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits (URLs) between the Ultra contemporary cTnI assay and the high-sensitivity (hs-cTnI) assay on Siemens Centaur in patients evaluated in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient at a U.S. urban academic hospital.

METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in an unselected patient cohort who presented to the hospital with symptoms suggestive of myocardial injury. All clinically ordered samples for cTnI assay (n = 1,056, LOQ 0.03 µg/L, URL 0.04 µg/L) were simultaneously tested on the hs-cTnI assay (LOQ 2.5 ng/L; URL 58 ng/L and 39 ng/L for male and female, respectively).

RESULTS: The incidence of elevated cTnI above the 99th percentile URL in males measured by the hs-cTnI assay was significantly lower compared to the cTnI assay (31.4% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.016), whereas there was no difference in females (27.4% vs. 30.2%, p = 0.35) in all the patient samples. In ED patient samples (n = 718), the incidence of elevated cTnI above the sex-specific 99th percentile URL was not significantly different between the hs-cTnI and contemporary cTnI assays in either sex (male: hs-cTnI 16.6% vs. cTnI 21.5%, p = 0.13; female: hs-cTnI 19.6% vs. cTnI 21.1%, p = 0.66). The agreement between the two assays was 93.5% (kappa = 0.798). Results were confirmed in an independent patient cohort measured by the same instruments at another hospital.

CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that implementation of the hs-cTnI assay would not lead to an increase in the proportion of elevated cTnI above the 99th percentile in the emergency department and other inpatient units.

DOI10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.12.001
Alternate JournalClin Biochem
PubMed ID33296707
Related Faculty: 
He Sarina Yang, M.D., Ph.D. Zhen Zhao, Ph.D.

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 Phone: (212) 746-6464
Surgical Pathology: (212) 746-2700